Radio Free Beszel
Radio Free Beszel
René Girard: Contagion and Scapegoat
Humans respond to plagues and social disorder with collective murder. Since antiquity, communities have chosen victims who are marginal or different. The perpetrators truly believe that the victim is guilty - a belief confirmed when the murder restores order.
René Girard argues that such murders are the foundation of social stability in cultures around the world, but that actual historical violence has been disguised as myth. He argues too that out of control mimetic contagion - rivalry arising from desire - is the reason for disorder in the first place.
These two contagions - disease and out-of-control rivalry - coincide in times of plague or pandemic. They are reinforced by empathy, by a belief in our own virtue, and by technologies that encourage imitation. The situation we are in now, with the COVID-19 pandemic and social media, is likely to lead to scapegoating of innocent victims. But we, like the ancients, will believe that we are bringing justice to the guilty.
Draws on René Girard's books, I See Satan Fall Like Lighting, The Scapegoat, and Things Hidden Since the Foundation of the World.
0:00
Good evening. This is Radio
Free Beszel. I am
0:03
Alphonse. Tonight, contagion
and scapegoat.
0:08
In my previous episode I spoke
about René Girard's
0:11
theory of identity and
desire, and I briefly
0:14
touched on his theory of
the scapegoat. In this
0:16
episode I'm going to go
into much more detail.
0:19
And I have found that it
is shockingly relevant
0:22
today in our time of pandemic,
of social justice,
0:26
of intense polarization. I'm
going to begin with a
0:30
story that Girard tells which
has come down to us
0:33
from the ancient world,
from the Greek city of
0:36
Ephesus in the second century,
which at that time
0:39
was suffering from a plague.
And a philosopher who
0:42
was in the city at the time,
Apollonius of Tyana,
0:46
told the people that he
could rid them of the
0:48
plague if only they would
follow him and do as
0:51
he said. So he led the citizens
to the theatre -
0:54
which i presume was an outdoor
amphitheatre - and
0:58
there they saw an old
man who looked like a
1:00
beggar. He was hunched over.
He was in rags. He
1:03
had a bag with a crust of
bread. And Apollonius
1:06
told the people, You need
to kill that man.
1:10
And they were astonished.
They said, It's just
1:13
a beggar - it's just an
old man! But Apollonius
1:16
insisted, and so they began
to stone him. And when
1:20
the first stone struck,
the old man looked up,
1:24
and in his eyes was red fire.
And then the people
1:26
knew that he was a demon
and they redoubled their
1:29
efforts, and threw so
many stones that
1:31
they pounded his body
to a bloody pulp.
1:35
And afterwards they said
that he looked as
1:37
if he was foaming at the
mouth like a dog.
1:40
And in celebration of their
victory over the
1:42
demon they erected a statue
to the god Hercules.
1:46
Girard chooses his story
because it seems to be
1:50
midway between history and
myth. It seems clear
1:53
that there really was a
collective murder in
1:56
Ephesus, but at the same
time we don't believe
1:59
that the old man was
a demon. What Girard
2:02
argues is that actual
historical murders
2:05
are obscured behind myth.
Now this kind of
2:08
collective murder was hardly
rare in Greece.
2:12
In Greek cities at certain
festivals they
2:14
would choose someone, often
someone marginal,
2:17
like a beggar. And they
would take that person,
2:19
and they would beat him,
and they would expel
2:21
him from the city, and they
would kill him. And
2:24
this was done in the belief
that it would rid
2:27
the city of illness and
disorder. And the name
2:30
that was given to this
victim was pharmakon,
2:34
which means poison, remedy
or scapegoat. It is
2:38
the root word of the modern
words pharmacy and
2:42
pharmaceutical. So deep is
the connection between
2:45
disease and plague and
scapegoating that it's
2:48
embedded in our language today.
What the scapegoat
2:52
does or what the murder
of the scapegoat does
2:56
is that it resolves disorder
in the community.
2:58
If you have a community
where the distinctions
3:01
between people have
broken down, where
3:03
respect for authority
is disappearing,
3:06
where people feel that the
society is unstable,
3:09
the scapegoat ritual can
resolve the problem.
3:14
But after the murder, it's
covered up. And Girard
3:16
says in the ancient world
this was through myth.
3:21
The first thing that is
done is to insist that
3:23
the victim is guilty. Now
this happens actually
3:25
before the murder,
but it's certainly
3:27
recorded in the stories
afterwards. And
3:29
you can see this
in the idea that
3:31
the old man was actually
a demon.
3:34
There's a second step that
sometimes happens,
3:37
which is deification. If
someone is so powerful
3:41
that they can place the
community at risk, or
3:44
that their death can save
it and remove disorder,
3:48
that suggests that perhaps
this person is a God.
3:50
And Girard claims that the
origin of many gods
3:53
and myth was actual scapegoat
rituals, by
3:56
which he means they weren't
myths at all,
3:58
they were actually historical
collective
4:01
murders that were concealed
behind myths,
4:03
and the victims were
deified. And in fact
4:06
many world myths - certainly
many that I
4:09
have read - revolve around
the death of a monster
4:13
or a god or a person, which
saved or even founded
4:17
a society or a culture.
But what's the cause of
4:22
the disorder that leads
to scapegoating? Girard
4:26
says that it's mimetic
desire - the imitative
4:29
desire that I described
in my previous episode.
4:33
What happens is that since
we imitate the desires
4:37
of others, he argues, we
end up competing for
4:40
the same things. We end
up in rivalry. And that
4:43
rivalry intensifies. If I'm
copying what you want
4:47
and you're copying what
I want then we're going
4:49
to end up in a vicious circle,
a feedback loop.
4:54
And as that intensifies,
the thing itself
4:56
drops out and what we're
actually imitating
4:59
is each other, mirroring
each other. I
5:01
mirror your anger. I
mirror your hate.
5:05
And you do the same to
me. I mirror your
5:08
violence and you mirror
mine. So emotions too
5:11
are contagious, and
in fact empathy
5:14
amplifies the feedback
loop.
5:18
As this happens in society,
the conflict can
5:21
spread. Other people
can imitate the same
5:23
desires. Other people can
be sucked into the same
5:27
conflicts. And then smaller
conflicts dissolve
5:30
into larger ones, Girard
says, like tributaries
5:33
feeding a river, until
finally you have a war
5:36
of all against all: a community
where there's
5:39
polarization and conflict
and hate everywhere.
5:44
And the scapegoat solves
this. Because when
5:47
the community turns on
a single individual
5:50
and transfers all that
hate and all that
5:53
anger onto him, then
they are unified.
5:56
And when they have expelled
him or destroyed
5:59
him, that unification lasts
- at least for a
6:02
time. They may repeat the
process with someone
6:05
else. And so scapegoating
the works once
6:08
may become rituals that are
continued over time.
6:13
Girard says that human
sacrifice was
6:15
foundational to many
ancient societies,
6:18
and it was only over time
that animals replaced humans.
6:21
And eventually in
some societies
6:22
there was no bloodletting
at all.
6:27
And who is chosen to be
the scapegoat? It's
6:30
someone who's different.
Girard particularly
6:33
emphasizes four qualities:
someone who is
6:36
foreign; someone who's
diseased or lame;
6:40
someone who violates
sexual taboos, like
6:42
those against bestiality
and incest;
6:45
or someone who is
exceptional, like
6:47
a king, or an artist,
or a thinker.
6:51
In fact, he says that the
Oedipus myth is an
6:53
example of this. For Oedipus
is all four of
6:55
those things: he is a
foreigner, he's lame,
6:58
he has sex with his mother,
and he's a king.
7:02
If Girard is right, the
tragedy of Oedipus,
7:05
the Greek play, reenacts
an actual sacrifice.
7:09
And I don't think
it's an accident
7:10
that the beggar in the
story in Ephesus
7:13
is killed in the theatre.
In fact, I've recently
7:15
rewatched the movie Gladiator,
and i was really
7:18
surprised to find at the
end it reenacted almost
7:21
exactly how Girard describes
a scapegoat ritual.
7:25
There's one complication,
which is two men
7:28
die: the gladiator and
the emperor. And
7:31
the emperor has three key
qualities that Girard
7:34
identifies: first, he's
emperor, he's powerful;
7:39
second, he's been
forcing himself
7:41
on his sister sexually;
and third,
7:44
he has a hare lip. Those are
three of the four key
7:47
qualities that Girard identifies
for scapegoats.
7:52
But in the final scene, when the
gladiator and the emperor die,
7:56
they are surrounded by
ring of soldiers, and
8:00
beyond them the community
of Rome in the Coliseum.
8:04
And this is how Girard
describes scapegoat
8:06
rituals: the community surrounds
the victim. Often
8:09
they stone him or they force
him off the edge of a
8:12
cliff, but they don't lay
a finger on him. And in
8:15
fact that's what the soldiers
do when the leader
8:17
at one point tells them
to sheath their swords.
8:20
When the emperor and the hero
die, we see the sun over Rome.
8:25
An unstable situation with
a bad emperor has been
8:28
solved and peace and order
have been restored.
8:33
So even today the
scapegoat ritual
8:35
seems to be embedded
in our culture.
8:38
But today we seem to
be in a particularly
8:40
difficult situation. We're
in the midst of
8:43
the pandemic. There
is social disorder
8:45
and polarization and
there's a loss of
8:47
respect for authority -
exactly the conditions
8:51
that Girard describes
lead to scapegoating.
8:55
And on top of that, we have
conditions for mimetic
8:58
contagion. That's what social
media seems to be
9:01
all about: the fear of missing
out, the imitation,
9:04
the rituals of exclusion
and cancellation.
9:08
Social media leads people
to imitate and for
9:11
social contagion to occur.
The psychologist
9:15
Jonathan Haidt has identified
social media as the
9:17
likely cause of a lot of
mental illness today.
9:20
And he's pointed to particular
features of
9:22
it: the like button, and
the share button.
9:27
And these are two mechanisms
of imitation
9:29
and copying of mimesis
and mimetic contagion.
9:34
Furthermore, our culture
emphasizes empathy.
9:37
But empathy, while it can
be good, can also be
9:41
negative, as an amplifier
of memetic contagion,
9:44
as an amplifier of the hate
and the antagonism
9:48
between people. Now those
who scapegoat are
9:51
unaware of what they've
done. They must be,
9:55
because they must be unified
against the victim.
9:58
And so they all believe that
the victim is guilty.
10:02
And then sometimes they
disguise that crime by
10:03
turning the victim into
something that he isn't:
10:05
a demon or a hero or a
god. But there's one
10:09
other thing, Girard says,
that the perpetrators
10:12
of scapegoating may do,
which is to say that
10:15
they're better than that,
to believe that
10:18
they're beyond it, to say
that their fathers
10:20
or their grandfathers
have scapegoated, but
10:23
they do not. And this illusion
actually makes it
10:26
easier for them to do it.
It makes it easier for
10:29
them to convince themselves
that the victim is not
10:32
innocent, that they are actually
enacting justice.
10:38
We have the perfect storm.
We have the social
10:42
media. We have the pandemic.
We have the
10:44
social disorder. We
have the empathy.
10:47
We have the belief
in our own virtue.
10:50
And if we scapegoat we will
not know that we did
10:54
it. Girard cites a philosopher,
Emmanuel Levinas,
10:59
who says that, if everyone
agrees that someone
11:02
is guilty, release him
for he is innocent.
11:06
This is Alphonse, for Radio
Free Beszel. www.beszel.ca.
11:14
Good night.