Radio Free Beszel

Hannah Arendt: Totalitarian Dreams

August 20, 2021 Alphonse Season 1 Episode 2
Radio Free Beszel
Hannah Arendt: Totalitarian Dreams
Show Notes Transcript Chapter Markers

Totalitarianism begins as dream. It ends in nightmare, the destruction of the individual. Hannah Arendt, a Jew who fled Hitler, analyzed the commonalities of communism and Naziism in her book, The Origins of Totalitarianism

Life doesn't make a very good story. It's inconsistent, irrational, unfair. We can end up feeling alienated alone, as though we don't matter. The totalitarian Big Lie provides an explanation, naming villains and identifying a narrative for pursuing justice. It seems to make sense of a senseless world. Through its actions, its continuous movement, it proves its lies true. 

Alone and insulated from the real world, it's easy to fall for the lie, to follow chains of logic that lead somewhere terrible. And one need not be alone. You may hear that the movement is violent and extreme, but the people you actually encounter are sympathizers or allies: normal, decent people who share some of its ideals and goals. They are the gateway to the movement. Once your are inside, they serve as insulation: even as the you get closer to the extreme core of the totalitarian ideology, you are always surrounded by people who make you feel less extreme than you are. it's an echo chamber. It is easy to believe that everyone (except for very bad people) agrees with you when the only people you encounter share your views. 

The ideology is total, because it claims that everything is political. It erases the distinction between public and private. Everyone is first and foremost an agent in pursuing the inevitable, just course of history. Even when the movement turns on them, believers often submit: a life given for the cause is better than a life (or death) without meaning.

0:00
Good evening. This is
Radio Free Beszel.

0:04
I am Alphonse. Tonight:
totalitarianism.

0:09
Imagine you're lonely.
I'm not talking about

0:12
solitude; I'm not talking
about the wind

0:14
in the trees or the songs
of birds and that

0:17
feeling of being connected
to all creation:

0:20
I'm talking more about
what it feels

0:22
like when you're on
the train to work

0:24
and the people who are
around you look

0:26
right through you as
if you're not there.

0:29
I'm talking about the
feeling that you have

0:31
problems and there's
no one to talk to,

0:33
and the more people are
around you the more you

0:37
feel alone. The world doesn't
make sense. It

0:40
seems random, arbitrary,
without meaning - you've

0:43
done all the right things,
you've worked hard,

0:48
you're not getting
ahead you're not

0:49
finding out what
it's all about.

0:53
Some groups are doing very
well. They're helping

0:55
people like them, but they're
not helping people

0:57
like you. I mean it's not
fair. A lot of people

1:01
know that it's not fair.
Now there's a movement,

1:05
and the movement - there
are rumors it's a

1:07
little bit crazy, a little
bit radical - it

1:10
has an explanation: There's
privilege, there's

1:13
favouritism, there's power
taken unfairly.

1:18
And although you've
heard these rumors

1:20
about it maybe being
a little crazy,

1:22
you notice more and more
that people around you

1:24
are sympathetic to the movement.
And these people

1:27
aren't crazy, they're not
radical, they don't

1:30
want to hurt anybody. You
know these people.

1:34
You learn that it's a big
story. It's not just

1:37
you. There are lots of people
who feel this way.

1:41
A lot of people think there's
something to it.

1:45
Now you get on your own
and you start thinking

1:47
about it. You think about
that privilege

1:49
and that power and that
injustice and it's

1:52
really clear - I mean
there's real truth

1:54
to it. This - this makes
sense. It would

1:57
explain so much. So you
join the movement.

2:03
And the movement - it does
things. It doesn't just talk.

2:06
It goes out and it protests.
It makes changes.

2:10
It gets bad people removed.
It helps good people.

2:14
And you find that when
everyone is together -

2:17
everyone is on the same side
- things can change.

2:21
You know now that enough is
enough. And you're not

2:24
just doing this for you:
you're doing it to help

2:28
everyone else. And the people
who come after you

2:31
realize in fact that the
injustice was so great

2:35
that it had to happen one
day. It was inevitable.

2:38
And the only people standing
against it - in fact

2:43
even people who are
simply neutral

2:45
and do nothing - those
are the people:

2:48
all they want to do is
keep the status quo

2:50
- in effect they're
favoring injustice.

2:56
Hannah Arendt was a Jew
who fled Germany when

2:58
Hitler took power. She
fled to France then to

3:01
the United States, and in
1951 she published a

3:04
book - The Origins of
Totalitarianism - which

3:07
was trying to explain what
had happened both

3:11
in Nazi Germany and in
Russia under Stalin.

3:16
And there're four factors
that I take,

3:18
or four ideas that
I want to focus on

3:20
from what Arendt described.
The first of these

3:23
- and I've tried to illustrate
all of them - the

3:27
first of these is loneliness.
You see, reality

3:30
has a problem. It really
isn't a good story.

3:35
It's inconsistent. A lot
of things don't make

3:38
sense. A lot of things
aren't explained. Good

3:41
things happen to bad people
bad things happen

3:44
to good people. It has
gaps, it has holes

3:48
that that never get filled.
What a totalitarian

3:53
ideology offers is a
big lie - a myth,

3:57
a story so big that it can
fill all those gaps.

4:01
When you compare the big
lie to actual reality,

4:05
the big lie looks truer.
It looks like a better

4:08
story that explains more
and is more meaningful.

4:14
The second idea is logic.

4:18
We get a lot of our knowledge
about the world

4:20
through interacting with
it, observing it,

4:22
testing things, seeing whether
things are true

4:24
or false, whether they work
or whether they they

4:26
don't work. But when we're
all alone the only real

4:29
kind of thought that we
can do is logic. We can

4:32
start with a premise and
we can develop it, and

4:35
we can develop it further
and see where it goes.

4:39
But as Arendt says, as she
warns, the problem with

4:42
logic is it doesn't really
generate new knowledge.

4:45
Everything it produces
was there

4:47
in a premise, or perhaps
an error,

4:50
and as you proceed with
your chain of logic you

4:53
can get farther and farther
from reality. Which

4:57
really isn't surprising,
because if reality -

4:59
if the real world - kind
of doesn't make sense,

5:02
then logic isn't necessarily
going to get you there.

5:07
The third thing that Arendt
talks about, the real

5:10
innovation that she credits
to totalitarianism,

5:14
is sympathizers, or what
we might call allies.

5:19
A totalitarian movement doesn't
just have members:

5:22
crucially, it also has these
allies around it.

5:27
These are people who have
not joined the movement,

5:29
but who sympathize with it,
who share some of its

5:32
ideas and goals. And they
perform a vital function

5:35
for helping the movement rise
and help it succeed.

5:40
The first of these functions
is that for

5:42
outsiders, they make
the movement seem

5:45
normal. There may be radicals
in the movement

5:47
who believe crazy things
or hateful things,

5:51
but if most of the people
you see who are

5:53
talking about it and sympathetic
to it are

5:55
reasonable ordinary people,
they make it

5:57
look normal. It makes
it look as if those

6:00
radicals are just
a few bad apples:

6:02
that's not really
what it's about.

6:05
The second function that
these allies perform

6:08
is for those who are
inside the movement.

6:11
If you're in the movement
and you're

6:14
starting to agree with
its beliefs, then

6:18
if you're surrounded by people
who sympathize with

6:20
the movement it seems like
you're in a majority,

6:23
as if everybody's on your
side, as if nobody

6:26
disagrees with you. And
you don't encounter

6:29
people who have other ideas.
And as you move

6:32
deeper and deeper into the
movement, as you become

6:36
more of a believer in
its core ideas, as

6:38
you discover how far it's
willing to go, at

6:41
every moment you're surrounded
by people who are

6:44
thinking just like that but
maybe not just so far

6:46
along. Arendt says that
a totalitarian movement

6:50
is like a secret society
that isn't secret. Even

6:54
within it it has gradations,
just like the the

6:57
sympathizers and the movement
members you have

7:00
people inside who have moved
to a certain level,

7:02
and other people who've moved
farther along. And

7:04
if you look around you and
you see these people,

7:07
and they have similar views,
you think, "Well you

7:09
know I'm just more advanced
than they are. When

7:12
they figure it out, when
they reason it through,

7:15
they'll follow me to where
I am." And so these

7:18
allies create this insulation,
this protection

7:22
that allows the movement
to grow without

7:24
seeing seeming too radical
from the outside,

7:28
and that allows the people
on the inside

7:30
to proceed and become
more extreme without

7:32
noticing they're becoming
more extreme - without

7:35
perhaps ever confronting
someone who disagrees.

7:39
What it does, she says,
is it blunts that

7:41
conflict. If a totalitarian
movement thrives

7:44
or at its heart has this
conflict between itself

7:48
and something it's fighting
against, what the

7:51
sympathizers do is blunt
that conflict and make

7:55
it look as if this is a
natural progression.

7:59
The fourth factor is action,
movement. The Nazis

8:03
talked about themselves as
a movement, a bewegung.

8:07
The big lie that the movement
tells isn't enough. I mean,

8:11
people don't just want ideas.
The real problem

8:14
in life - if, say you're
lonely or unhappy, or

8:17
you're not finding meaning
- isn't just a matter

8:20
of what you think. It's a
matter of what you do.

8:23
How do i live my life?
How do i solve these

8:26
problems? Well, the movement
solves that,

8:29
or addresses it through
movement, through action

8:33
- and it proves that its
false reality, that the

8:37
myth that it tells is true
through that action.

8:41
For example, if the movement
tells you that race

8:46
is everything - and you
find in fact that

8:48
whether you get a job
depends on your race,

8:52
and whether you have friends
or are able to join

8:55
social groups or social
activities depends on your

8:57
race, whether you get food
rations depends on

9:00
your race, indeed in the
end whether you live

9:02
at all depends on your
race - then the

9:05
movement has proved
the lie correct.

9:11
As long as the movement
is creating its own

9:14
reality, it can make the
big lie seem true.

9:18
So the movement has
to keep moving.

9:21
It has to continually
make what

9:23
its leaders may call
predictions, but are in fact

9:27
intentions that then have
to be realized, at even

9:30
very high cost. It's worthwhile
for the leadership

9:33
and for the movement to make
its actions happen,

9:37
to make things happen so
that the lie seems to be

9:40
true. Because if it loses
that momentum, it may

9:44
lose the faith of its believers:
but so long as

9:47
it has that momentum it can
be very hard to stop,

9:51
because when you're in
this movement and it

9:53
seems so powerful, and
everybody is on the

9:55
same same side, and they're
all moving in the

9:58
same direction, it can
seem as if this is an

10:00
inevitable part of history.
You know, at first

10:03
you may have thought that
you need to fight for

10:05
the movement to make it
progress, but now it seems

10:08
that this was going to happen
anyway, and the only

10:12
question is are you going
to join with history or

10:15
are you going to be off to
the side, irrelevant.

10:20
It's not enough for
the movement in

10:22
fact if you choose
to support it.

10:24
Because choosing to agree
is still a choice. If

10:28
the movement is inevitable,
there are no choices.

10:33
This compulsion can
be so strong that

10:35
people give up their
lives for it.

10:37
Arendt gives the example
of Stalin's secret

10:40
police. He would send
the police to pick

10:43
someone up. They pick you
up and they accuse

10:45
you: "You," they say, "well
you have been you,

10:47
pretend to be a faithful
member of the

10:49
movement, but in fact
you betrayed us."

10:52
And they accuse you of
something that you

10:54
did not do, and they
ask you to confess.

10:57
You say, "I didn't do it,"
and they say, "It

11:01
doesn't matter, comrade.
If you didn't do it

11:05
you still need to
confess, because

11:07
that's what the movement
asks of you.

11:10
Do you want to stand in
the way of history,

11:12
or do you want to
help us succeed?"

11:15
And you're left with a terrible
choice. Because

11:18
if you refuse to confess they
will still kill you,

11:21
but your life will
be meaningless.

11:23
It will be as if you
had never lived.

11:26
If, on the other hand,
you confess, at

11:28
least you will be helping
something that

11:31
you believed in and
fought for. At

11:33
least your life will
have meaning.

11:39
You notice in my description
of all of this, up

11:41
until that last example,
I said nothing about

11:44
violence. Because that's
not the core concept of

11:47
totalitarianism. It's not
about what prejudices it

11:51
has or what groups it hates.
It's about dissolving

11:55
individuals into the total
organism: the idea that

12:00
society is like a creature
or a machine, and

12:03
every person has their
role in that machine,

12:06
that politics is everywhere,
there is no

12:09
private place you can go,
there is no personal:

12:12
there is only political.
The movement is total

12:16
and that's why it's called
totalitarianism.

12:23
This is Alphonse for Radio Free
Beszel. B-E-S-Z-E-L. Good night.

Introduction
Hannah Arendt
Sympathizers and allies
Action and the Big Lie
Erasing the individual